AWOP News Survey Responses


 1. Overall very positive feedback   

 A. People read most of the AWOP News (55%). 

B.  AWOP News helps people feel connected to AWOP (44% Strongly Agree/38% Agree)

C.  The majority of people keep AWOP News as a resource (67%)

 2. What respondents are interested in: 9 respondents, when asked what they liked about AWOP News,   commented on an interest of actions in other State/Regions

 3. What respondents don’t like:  Most, 5 respondents had no negative comments on AWOP News. 

 4. Areas for improvement:

3 respondents had comments on more information regarding operator/utilities

2 respondents commented on a desire for more data comparison/progress

5. Information about respondents:

Most were state representatives participating in AWOP (57%) followed by state representative not participating in AWOP (22%)

 Survey Questions and Responses

 Question 1.  Which of the following statements is most accurate about your experience with the AWOP Newsletter?

Read all of it.   11.8% 4
Read most of it.   55.9% 19
Read some of it.   23.5% 8
Did not ready any of it.   8.8% 3

 Question 2.  Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with each statement.



Strongly Agree




Strongly Disagree



The newsletter helps me feel connected to the AWOP.

44.1% (15)

38.2% (13)

11.8% (4)

2.9% (1)

0.0% (0)

2.9% (1)


The newsletter is useful and valuable to me.

29.4% (10)

55.9% (19)

11.8% (4)

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

2.9% (1)


The newsletter is easy to read.

26.5% (9)

52.9% (18)

17.6% (6)

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

2.9% (1)


Regularly receiving the AWOP newsletter is important to me.

35.3% (12)

44.1% (15)

17.6% (6)

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

2.9% (1)


The newsletter effectively provides information relevant to my needs in AWOP

29.4% (10)

41.2% (14)

23.5% (8)

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

5.9% (2)


Overall, I am satisfied with the AWOP newsletter.

24.2% (8)

66.7% (22)

6.1% (2)

0.0% (0)

0.0% (0)

3.0% (1)



 Question 3.  Do you keep the newsletter as a resource?







 Question 4. Tell us what you like about the AWOP Newsletter.

 Interest in other States/Regions

-Keeping abreast of what is happening in the other Regions

-I like catching up on all the state programs.

-I’m interested in new ideas on projects happening in other states.

-State implementation is worthwhile case history.

-Various types of technical assistance being provided by states

-What other states/regions are doing

-Activities in other States/EPA Regions

-Love the technical updates and also seeing what the other states are doing.

-Reading about activities of each of the regional AWOP planning meetings.

-Articles giving state updates and technical articles

 Other Comments

-It is organized well for reading and provided up-to-date information.

-Case studies

-Current updates in the AWOP field and who the members are

-‘Did not know there was an AWOP newsletter.

-I like the new web-based approach!

-I like to hear about how AWOP is changing and AWOP success stories.

-Helps keep us focused on providing needed technical services.

-Very informative

-The Optimization State



-Lets me sit back a bit to see a larger picture.

-It is a simple newsletter without all the hype!

 Question 5.  Tell us what you do not like about the AWOP Newsletter.


-Don’t have anything I dislike.


-Nothing — it’s all good.

-Nothing I can think of


Length of Articles/Size of Newsletter

-Some of the articles are lengthy and I don’t feel like I always have the time to read them in depth.

-Overall pretty good – some articles are too lengthy

-Too large


-Seems to focus on EPA and state efforts without inclusion of other players; TA providers, trainers, equipment suppliers.

-I wish each article is kept together. (ie like reading an artilce on page 1 and then having to turn to page 5 to read the rest of the article)

-Did not know there was an AWOP newsletter. 

Question 6.  What should be done to improve the AWOP Newsletter?

Focus on operators

-Make more of a universal resource for operators

-I would like it to reveal more of what operators have learned through the AWOP processes

-more input from the utilities who participate

Comparison data/progress

-Incorporate some kind of progress meter (or status meter) on an annual basis, showing how many states, systems, people, etc. are positively affected by a particular aspect of AWOP (i.e., how many states have done DBP PBT, how many people

-If we can get some data that is comparable to see how the regions/states stack up to each other, that would be great.


-Shorter format project briefs – with contact info if I need more detail. I don’t get through all of the articles – I know they are good, but I don’t always have time to read the entire article.

-Incorporate more tips, tricks, and practical application elements

-Keeping teaching up skills to use!

-It would be helpful if the AWOP newsletter would include sources of funding for AWOP, sources for training for participants, and results of AWOP in each state.

-I’d say more stories, but it’s probably like pulling teeth to get them, so I won’t.

-More concentrated

-Did not know there was an AWOP newsletter

Question 7.  Please check the category that most accurately describes you:




US EPA Regional Representative Participating in AWOP  



US EPA Regional Representative not Participating in AWOP  



State Representative Participating in AWOP  



State Representative not Participating in AWOP  



Drinking Water System Operator  






Comments are closed.